Analysing Willfred Owens Dulce Et Decorum Est. Essay -- English Liter

Analysing Willfred Owens Dulce Et Decorum Est.Dulce ET Decorum Est is an anti-war metrical composition, which emphasizes theintensity of war. The meaning of the ironic title roughly translatedinto it is good and honourable but is not full established untilyou examine the poem. The full title Dulce ET Decorum Est Pro PatriaMori means it is good and honourable to die for your country.However the main aspect of this poem is paradoxical to its title. Thisdemonstrates the message Wilfred Owens is insinuating and hisattitude towards war.The poem is regarding Wilfred Owen and his troop of exhausted soldiersmaking their way back to base after combat at the foregoing line until agas shell is fired at them. A soldier is fatally gassed, is put in anambulance dying slowly and then eaten away(predicate) from the inside.Owen describes a man being engulfed by gas,Dim through the misty panes and thick green light,Under a green sea I apothegm him drowning.The death and distress is shown and the h arsh actuality of waruncovered. It is almost as though you are reliving the agony the manis suffering. The reader is nowhere near as unfortunate as Wilfred. Hewas repeatedly tortured by his experiences even after having toencounter them.In all my dreams before my helpless sight,He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning.It is an inescapable memory that haunts him even when he attempts tosleep, on constant replay in his treacherous mind. His feeling ofhelplessness from that moment were captured and frozen, regret for not luck covered with hope, the possibility that he was unable to doanything useful anyway. A sense of regret, disbelief and anger arereused in other anti-war poems that Wilfred Owen ha... ... aid the upset once and stillendured. Owen has created a way that transports the reader back to thescene of the poem. Using the effectiveness of the senses. He describesthe sounds, the smells and the sights around to give the feeling thatyou witnessing the happenings expressed .My final contemplations to dissolve this analysis are not in despairbut queries, whether it is rhetorical or not I am not completely sure.The thing that concerns me is how the administration send men off to fightwar when under the misapprehension that they are fighting for theircountry? Do they have no conscious, no wickedness in sending the doomedyouth off to their inevitable deaths? The decisions they makeobviously have repercussions as do all decisions, but to knowingly chastise so many innocent people to physical and mental torture thendeath, to me is worse murder, is it not?